From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2586a992fd399bf8
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!r4g2000vbq.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Hacid <chadi.alkurdi@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: limited /non-limited tagged type
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 14:21:53 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <76f09e04-5e4b-42bf-8029-8ac09660655c@r4g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <40bfb845-7868-4536-886b-496e8dc82cb4@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <4d714736$0$6979$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <9e7a23dd-883c-46fa-88a4-b0ce9aab529d@r4g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.35.74.134
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1299277314 5845 127.0.0.1 (4 Mar 2011 22:21:54
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 22:21:54 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: r4g2000vbq.googlegroups.com; posting-host=62.35.74.134;
 posting-account=WWXKmwoAAABMGIRzC01nO809MBj4MWaf
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; fr; rv:1.9.2.14)
 Gecko/20110221 Ubuntu/10.10 (maverick) Firefox/3.6.14,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17847
Date: 2011-03-04T14:21:53-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

To explain in other words my problem :
I want to control type assignment but :
 1) I can't use Ada.Limited_Controlled because I have a ZFP Run Time
 2) I can't use limited tagged type because I need to perform array
copies of derivated type
 3) I can't just say "Do not use assignment" because without checks
they will do

So I was hoping that Ada have a construct to solve this problem...
But maybe a rule checker is the best way  :o(