From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a0224dc3d1e52f3d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dennison@telepath.com
Subject: Re: Streams and Concurrency
Date: 1998/12/30
Message-ID: <76dhm3$rkq$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 427116597
References: <76c3tv$acs@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>
 <76cat4$2ldc$1@news.gate.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x9.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Dec 30 15:42:59 1998 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 1998-12-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <76cat4$2ldc$1@news.gate.net>,
  "David Botton" <dbotton@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Would you be able to post a small sample demonstrating this.
>
> David Botton
>
> James S. Rogers wrote in message <76c3tv$acs@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>...
> >A question was recently raised about task safe use of streams.
>
> ETC....
>
>

Actually, I already have code that does that and probably could post it if
you really want to see it. Unfortunately, it doesn't really solve the problem
unless don't mind interleaved data on your stream. Also, if your reader task
does any kind of extra blocking or protocol on the data, he could concievably
end up doing that on every single non-composite field that was in your
structure. (Ewww!)

--
T.E.D.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own