From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.66.118.134 with SMTP id km6mr48941703pab.37.1438273799342;
 Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.98.117 with SMTP id n108mr648421qge.23.1438273799292;
 Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!f3no4995793igg.0!news-out.google.com!78ni191qge.1!nntp.google.com!69no2846546qgl.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ly7fphbozr.fsf@pushface.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=81.203.145.32;
 posting-account=AFCLjAoAAABJAOf_HjgEEEi3ty-lG5m2
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.203.145.32
References: <e610ca1e-4df6-4fbb-b3a1-ac35694d9072@googlegroups.com>
 <mp645u$abo$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <2df4698f-4c8e-457c-822d-209cb2f8ab5e@googlegroups.com>
 <mp8r8l$fnn$1@loke.gir.dk> <lywpxjxxza.fsf@pushface.org>
 <mpbb7i$vmi$1@loke.gir.dk> <lybneuya0a.fsf@pushface.org>
 <c8321f5c-71e0-46cc-a04d-a20f848983bd@googlegroups.com>
 <ly7fphbozr.fsf@pushface.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <76a06b25-96c1-49d2-8b88-e0a8ece98cc0@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Running a preprocessor from GPS?
From: EGarrulo <egarrulo@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:29:59 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:194531
Date: 2015-07-30T09:29:59-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 6:14:52 PM UTC+2, Simon Wright wrote:
> EGarrulo writes:
> 
> > KISS solution:
> >
> >        TickCount := (if System.FreeRTOS.Tasks.In_ISR
> >                      then xTaskGetTickCountFromISR
> >                      else xTaskGetTickCount)
> >        return Tick * Time_Base (TickCount);
> >
> > or:
> >
> >        if System.FreeRTOS.Tasks.In_ISR then 
> >           TickCount := xTaskGetTickCountFromISR;
> >        else 
> >           TickCount := xTaskGetTickCount;
> >        end if;
> >        return Tick * Time_Base (TickCount);
> 
> Both of these require Tick_Count (!)

But then why did you write xTaskGetTickCountFromISR (!)? :D

I know, I know: they must be system calls.  I just went with what -- at first
sight -- seemed your naming convention.