From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,15890893c0618a8a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: JP Thornley Subject: [Q] Tools for Ada Quality and Style Date: 1996/04/25 Message-ID: <767968529wnr@diphi.demon.co.uk>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 151494987 x-nntp-posting-host: diphi.demon.co.uk references: <9604172134.AA27114@eight-ball> x-mail2news-path: relay-4.mail.demon.net!post.demon.co.uk!diphi.demon.co.uk organization: None reply-to: jpt@diphi.demon.co.uk newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-04-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article: <9604172134.AA27114@eight-ball> Bob Crispen writes: > [in reply to a query about Ada standards] > > Ada Quality & Style, from > > http://sw-eng.falls-church.va.us/AdaIC/docs/style-guide/ > > One there for Ada 95 and one for Ada 83. Accept no substitutes. > We are currently looking at redoing our standards and are likely to base them closely on these. What would also be very useful is a pretty-printer (or a conformance checker) that can implement the standards we end up with. I have found one tool on the Walnut Creek CD-ROM - I don't have this available at present but I think it is called NAPPI (IIRC its from NASA and dates from around 1988). Does anyone have any experience of using this (is it a good base for a tailored pretty-printer)? Alternatively does anyone know of any other similar tools. (Note that we will be using Ada 83 for some time yet as well as Ada 95). Thanks in advance. Phil Thornley -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | JP Thornley EMail jpt@diphi.demon.co.uk | ------------------------------------------------------------------------