From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4eb39f748fcf3a97
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@gnat.com
Subject: Re: endian-independent rep clauses (was Re: GNAT Opinions)
Date: 1998/12/28
Message-ID: <7673la$oj0$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 426332895
References: <75rj7i$2cq$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <75rvnq$h75@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com> <75tr9e$3h8$1@remarQ.com>
 <760d41$p6r$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7667t3$3kj$1@remarQ.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x1.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 166.72.71.106
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Dec 28 05:06:51 1998 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1998-12-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <7667t3$3kj$1@remarQ.com>,
  "Pat Rogers" <progers@NOclasswideSPAM.com> wrote:
> dewarr@my-dejanews.com wrote in message
> >Consider one of the most fundamental, which
> >is that you have an external data stream that produces a
> >big endian integer as four consecutive bytes in
> >big-endian order. There is no magic rep clause to cause
> >a compiler on a little-endian machine to acquire this
> >data "correctly". Indeed the difficulty may vary from
> >machine to machine, on some machines a quite long and
> >tedious sequence of instructions may be required to
> >reassemble the data.
>
> I answer with more than a little trepidation, knowing
> that you are capable of arguing one side to "victory"
> only to then switch and
> argue the other side!  :-)

Well I should hope so, if you can't argue both sides of
a technical issue, it must mean you don't understand the
issue and therefore should not argue on either side :-)

> Seriously, I would consider the above to be a separate
> problem, since indeed a record rep clause will not handle
> it.  It does what Norm said it does, and nothing more.

Yes, and seriously, that *is* the problem. Most people when
they ask about this problem, and in particular when they
ask about overriding the default bit order are after a
solution for this "separate problem"!

Robert Dewar
Ada Core Technologies

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own