From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_WORDY,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,447bc52ed320646f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Juergen.Pfeifer@t-online.de (Juergen Pfeifer) Subject: Re: gnat friendly Linux Distribution Date: 1998/12/23 Message-ID: <75r7cg$opl$1@news08.btx.dtag.de>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 425220436 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: <75r2ja$ekv$1@nw001t.infi.net> X-Sender: 06162912249-0001@t-online.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.de X-Trace: news08.btx.dtag.de 914432208 25397 193.159.3.13 06162912249-0001 Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-12-23T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: The order is Debian > SuSE > RedHat Debian has 3.10p supported, the brandnew SuSE according to their package list supports outdated 3.09 (although they claim to support the most actual gnat version) and RH doesn't support gnat at all. Nevertheless you can get 3.10 packes for RH (and SuSE). The nice thing with Debian is that they separated gnat from gcc. You have to use the command "gnatgcc" (although the better advice is always to use gnatmake) to compile Ada sources, but the gnat installation no longer interferes with gcc or egcs installs. I did build something similar for RH and I guess the close to be released 3.11p will be available for RH. Juergen Srinivasan, R schrieb in Nachricht <75r2ja$ekv$1@nw001t.infi.net>... >Is there a particular Linux distribution to prefer (or to avoid) to host Ada >95 development - using gnat? The choices I am considering are : >RH2/Debian/Suse. I am particularly interested in gdb and some gui >development. > >regards > >srini >r.srinivasan@eudoramail.com > > >