From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-13 21:09:08 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!elnk-pas-nf1!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newshub.sdsu.edu!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 23:09:04 -0600 Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 00:09:03 -0500 From: "Robert I. Eachus" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Clause "with and use" References: for reply from news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no> <3FAF8C99.5040201@noplace.com> <3FB1609E.D56E315C@fakeaddress.nil> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <75qdnZeRyrHs_imiRVn-sQ@comcast.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.34.214.193 X-Trace: sv3-PshW2RyXQHR4ek8CgNLOjI2krwPhO37MW7S27L/azuUVkOsoBUHeQeNemZuCkd0umWE4ieODGV2TFLX!cP0+8uaIB/NsCdrmY/uJaV+KENBgyTmWXp2pyMSTagTBImhKashda8lmB37kDA== X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2471 Date: 2003-11-14T00:09:03-05:00 List-Id: Chad R. Meiners wrote: > But it isn't clutter; with and use serve two different purposes so they > shouldn't be combined. As I have said before, what has come out of this discussion that is very worthwhile is the idea of adding, "use all {package name}" to the language. There are places where having a single use clause instead of a series of them would be a big improvement. It would be nice to allow 'use all' to apply to generic instances. But I think that in practice, a 'use all' that was the equivalent of a use clause for all child packages of a package would encourage people to make generic instantiations child units where appropriate. -- Robert I. Eachus 100% Ada, no bugs--the only way to create software.