From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fc079680c0debb41 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Subject: Re: GNAT Binary Distributions : GPL or Not ??? Date: 1998/12/22 Message-ID: <75nv0t$uu1$1@news.nyu.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 424796647 References: <367EBB06.AF240804@saltedchocolateballs.co.uk> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 914325341 31681 (None) 128.122.140.194 Organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-12-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article jerry@jvdsys.stuyts.nl (Jerry van Dijk) writes: >>From 2.8.x on, all GNAT relevant patches are included in gcc. Not completely correct. It is true for GNAT 3.10, which is what I think you meant, but GNAT 3.11 has some patches that postdate the GCC 2.8.1 release. They will be in GCC 2.9, however. They are also in recent EGCS releases, but EGCS has changed the front end interface in an incompatible way, so it is not possible to have a version of a front end that works for both EGCS and GCC2 (and EGCS will continue to change the interface, so this will be an ongoing problem).