From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.67.1.102 with SMTP id bf6mr7364723pad.19.1445429560882;
        Wed, 21 Oct 2015 05:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.182.116.130 with SMTP id jw2mr124835obb.4.1445429560847;
 Wed, 21 Oct 2015 05:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!kq10no20688990igb.0!news-out.google.com!n2ni36780igy.0!nntp.google.com!kq10no20688989igb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 05:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <mvlopk$49j$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=46.218.2.213;
 posting-account=21X1fwoAAABfSGdxRzzAXr3Ux_KE3tHr
NNTP-Posting-Host: 46.218.2.213
References: <mvlopk$49j$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <75f38e30-42ba-4e98-8f36-2218b5167209@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Musings on RxAda
From: Hadrien Grasland <hadrien.grasland@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:12:40 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:28010
Date: 2015-10-21T05:12:40-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Reading through my post again, I should 1/Apologize for the missing words h=
ere and there and 2/Point out that my implementation of Observable is mostl=
y synchronous, because all the costly mapping work occurs within the accept=
 rendezvous.

To make an asynchronous Observer would require quite a couple more tweaks, =
allowing the Observer task to save its entry parameters and use them once t=
he computation is over. In particular, the output channel should be passed =
by access, rather than by in out value.

This does not, however, void my core point that Ada's accessibility rules w=
ould end up getting in our way if we wanted to implement something like Rea=
ctiveX for Ada.