From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a24:2f0e:: with SMTP id j14mr12323719itj.14.1547826502407; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 07:48:22 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:ef3:: with SMTP id 106mr318200otj.6.1547826502111; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 07:48:22 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!85.12.16.70.MISMATCH!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!k10no75678itk.0!news-out.google.com!v71ni107ita.0!nntp.google.com!k10no75674itk.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 07:48:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=208.114.128.49; posting-account=MRPdDAoAAADUJmZVjnYaoafXFMadSeY1 NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.114.128.49 References: <2a6929c5-72fa-4d84-953a-44ea4597ab38@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <75328dc5-fc59-4228-b77e-77ba6e5101c3@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: class wide iterable (and indexable) From: Olivier Henley Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:48:22 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Received-Bytes: 2293 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2926580954 Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55305 Date: 2019-01-18T07:48:21-08:00 List-Id: > > The people doing that like a lot of about C already (why the mass hysteria > > on that, I don't know. Perhaps they don't even know that you can do > > better?). If I personally redesigned Ada, it would be a lot like the current > > Ada with some warts removed (strings and arrays in particular). > > See, that is the same mindset! (:-)) What are the warts for strings and arrays?