From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a81289725302b2f6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Alex R. Mosteo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Distro with the best Ada development environment? Followup-To: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:49:44 +0200 Message-ID: <74rfnoF152obcU1@mid.individual.net> References: <_t8Fl.24641$Ws1.11326@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com> <14bfe62d-d121-4f44-8d05-7a542c3d008b@a7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <49e5a8e9$0$30232$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <49e782da$0$31871$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: individual.net 7TPRzsee79QWHQgp/ruvqwbBU27jSyQsjWfu9TODZ+anGJlGs= Cancel-Lock: sha1:eNhffiLOo4F2jjBIwEtPA50oDgw= User-Agent: KNode/0.99.01 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5486 Date: 2009-04-17T15:49:44+02:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus wrote: > Ludovic Brenta wrote: >> On Apr 15, 11:29 am, Georg Bauhaus >> wrote: >>> Ludovic Brenta schrieb: >>> >>>> Xavier Grave wrote on comp.lang.ada: >>>>> To have a full list, just install a Debian or ask Ludovic Brenta who >>>>> is responsible for Ada in Debian. >>>> There is an overview of most Ada distributions in the Ada Programming >>>> wikibook[1]. Indeed, I am responsible for most of Ada in Debian which >>>> is TTBOMK the only distribution with a consistent policy for Ada. >>> FYI, there are a few, uhm, instabilities in 64bit Debian-based >>> installations (Ubuntu 8.04.2 LTS server, i.e. not Debian), >> >> There have been reports of breakage in dependencies between Ada >> packages on Ubuntu. As you say, Ubuntu is not Debian. >> >>> gdb issues, and lo and behold, even a segfault when running >>> 64bit Spark tools. See also gcc:#39264, Ubuntu:#219342. >> [...] >> >> I'm curious to know whether or not these bugs also affect Debian 5.0. >> Could you try it? > > The spark program SEGFAULTs when run on Debian 5 AMD64 stable. > I used valgrind to look into this and inspecting the output > of valgrind made me think I should set a higher stack size limit. > I did, and the symptom went away. (The default stack size is 8192.) Did you use -fstack-check? Without it, it's normal to get violations instead of Storage_Error. Even with it, it's not 100% reliable.