From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,74592f8704ca8a3f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewarr@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: Ada.Streams
Date: 1998/12/11
Message-ID: <74q9gp$ppc$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 421068191
References: <74pdkb$22v$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x6.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Dec 11 05:10:50 1998 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1998-12-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <74pdkb$22v$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
  krreagan@yahoo.com wrote:
> We are implementing a message passing mechanism with two
> nodes on an isolated
> network and would like to use Ada.Streams to pass the
> messages. The
> LRM/Rational are not very detailed on the use of streams
> (Also Cohen is very
> sparse on this subject).


Why not use annex E (distribution) facilities for solving
this problem, and avoid low level messing with streams!

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own