From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ca15935e4fb21334
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dennison@telepath.com
Subject: Re: Storage space question
Date: 1998/12/10
Message-ID: <74pacb$uqu$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 420908478
References: <9v6hGdgMLuwN-pn2-v5sq1RxFJ1z1@dt182n2f.tampabay.rr.com>
 <366FE278.FAF73497@pwfl.com> <m3vhjk53rs.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x14.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Dec 10 20:19:25 1998 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 1998-12-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <m3vhjk53rs.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>,
  Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org> wrote:
> Marin David Condic <condicma@bogon.pwfl.com> writes:
>
> > allocation. In most compilers of this sort, if you promise not to ask
> > certain kinds of questions the compiler will agree to make
> > smaller/faster code, so look into the implementation defined pragmas and
> > compiler options.
>
> Not implementation-defined, standard-defined: pragma Discard_Names
> throws away the tables containing the images of enumeration literals.

Craig said he is using an Ada *83* compiler. In my copy of the Ada 83
standard there is nothing in Appendix B between CONTROLLED and ELABORATE.
That would make any such pragma implementation defined, as Marin stated.

--
T.E.D.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own