From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2702c1ed8be62863 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Pat Rogers" Subject: Re: What ada 83 compiler is *best* Date: 1998/12/08 Message-ID: <74jpk8$p8j$1@remarQ.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 420122294 References: <3666F5A4.2CCF6592@maths.unine.ch> <74hk55$6t5$1@remarQ.com> <74jhct$e2m$1@remarQ.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@remarQ.com X-Trace: 913140168 Y6JRGRJUHDE72C640C usenet87.supernews.com Organization: Software Arts & Sciences Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-12-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Rick Thorne wrote in message ... >In article <74jhct$e2m$1@remarQ.com>, "Pat Rogers" >If you'll excuse me, I've found rational people who are ANSWERING my >questions. Without regret, I do hereby killfile thee... I note that in another post you say: "I thank you all for your responses and apologize for some of my tone. I may have come off as an arrogant brat, but I do like and respect you all. I've been trying to get answers to my very important career choice questions, and since the I Ching was unclear I decided to try the direct approach. I've found this in life: if you want a response, ask a question. If you want and answer, piss someone off. It's contrary to me nature, but it DOES work." When answers included concrete facts you invoked aliens and silliness rather than discuss the data. A killfile for the answers you don't like seems a strange way to learn. >Smuggly, Indeed.