From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.224.171.72 with SMTP id g8mr48968776qaz.7.1374887325504;
        Fri, 26 Jul 2013 18:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.28.78 with SMTP id z14mr67196igg.5.1374887325456; Fri, 26
 Jul 2013 18:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder02.blueworldhosting.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!cb17no9015qab.0!news-out.google.com!dk8ni3qab.0!nntp.google.com!cb17no9014qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 18:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ksv36l$tnc$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=66.126.103.122;
 posting-account=RxNzCgoAAACA5KmgtFQuaU-WaH7rjnAO
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122
References: <lywqodrv51.fsf@pushface.org> <ksun08$tbn$1@dont-email.me>
 <cee34511-bfa7-49e1-a1b1-e7a01b42df58@googlegroups.com>
 <ksv36l$tnc$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <74eafc92-e3bb-4ce3-bae1-8b2e3430b60d@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with limited with
From: Adam Beneschan <adambeneschan@aol.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 01:08:45 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2163
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:16540
Date: 2013-07-26T18:08:45-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, July 26, 2013 5:17:21 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Carter wrote:
> On 07/26/2013 03:17 PM, Adam Beneschan wrote:
>=20
> >
>=20
> > C'mon, people.  It should be possible to ask a question about the langu=
age
> > rules by posting a reduced case, without getting comments about why the
> > poster didn't write his code a different way, or why the identifiers ar=
en't
> > descriptive, or why a complete working example wasn't posted or somethi=
ng.
>=20
> It should be possible to post a reduced example that actually uses the fe=
ature
> that causes the problem.

As someone who often tries to answer (and sometimes asks) questions involvi=
ng language rules, I only want to see the parts of the code that are releva=
nt to the language-law question--even if that results in an example that (b=
y itself) would be useless in real life.  But adding other stuff just gets =
in the way. =20

                                -- Adam