From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,95eaa0c908f1c040
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dramirez@cs.uml.edu (Dr Amirez)
Subject: Re: the Ada object oriented-approach is stupid
Date: 1998/11/27
Message-ID: <73ng1d$vc7$1@jupiter.cs.uml.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 416357142
References: <01be184b$6c7cbac0$7a36e5c0@pearl> <9eV62.403$Wj.3147@SnBeta>
 <1998Nov27.163354.1@eisner>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@uml.edu
X-Trace: ulowell.uml.edu 912212845 30175 129.63.1.6 (28 Nov 1998 00:27:25 GMT)
Organization: UMass-Lowell Computer Science
NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Nov 1998 00:27:25 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-11-28T00:27:25+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1998Nov27.163354.1@eisner> Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam writes:
>In article <9eV62.403$Wj.3147@SnBeta>, "Pat Rogers" <progers@NOclasswideSPAM.com> writes:
>> partha sarathi panda wrote in message
>> <01be184b$6c7cbac0$7a36e5c0@pearl>...
>>>can anyone convince me on why the Ada object-oriented model does
>> even
>>>compare with  the tight c++ one?
>> 
>> 
>> Why is a person from Rational asking this question?
>
>Presumably for the same reason anyone from any company might.
>
>Did you think Rational was composed entirely of people devoted to Ada ?
>Perhaps the purpose of the post is to disabuse you of that notion :-)
>
>Larry Kilgallen

Grady Booch himself authored some C++ book, didn't he? :)
Dr Amirez