From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,95eaa0c908f1c040
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Richard D Riehle <LaoXhai@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: the Ada object oriented-approach is stupid
Date: 1998/11/25
Message-ID: <73hok7$s41@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 415596047
References: <01be184b$6c7cbac0$7a36e5c0@pearl>
Organization: ICGNetcom
X-NETCOM-Date: Wed Nov 25  2:17:11 PM CST 1998
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-11-25T14:17:11-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <01be184b$6c7cbac0$7a36e5c0@pearl>,
	"partha sarathi panda" <ppanda@rational.com> wrote:

>can anyone convince me on why the Ada object-oriented model does even
>compare with  the tight c++ one?
>

   "He convinced against his will is of the same opinion still."

   "For those who believe, no proof is necessary.  For those who
    do not, no proof is acceptable."

I wish I had attributions for these quotes, but they seem to suit the
tone of the inquiry.

Richard Riehle
richard@adaworks.com
http://www.adaworks.com