From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,95eaa0c908f1c040
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dennison@telepath.com
Subject: Re: the Ada object oriented-approach is stupid
Date: 1998/11/25
Message-ID: <73h3g0$ptv$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 415521577
References: <01be184b$6c7cbac0$7a36e5c0@pearl>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x10.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Nov 25 14:16:53 1998 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 1998-11-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <01be184b$6c7cbac0$7a36e5c0@pearl>,
  "partha sarathi panda" <ppanda@rational.com> wrote:
> can anyone convince me on why the Ada object-oriented model does even
> compare with  the tight c++ one?
>
>
Perhaps you should join the thread ""Classes" as packages in Ada", already in
progress...

--
T.E.D.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own