From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bfb89d61cc46e4b3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewarr@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: What ada 83 compiler is *best*.
Date: 1998/11/21
Message-ID: <7357or$pbo$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 414068740
References: <72ue3m$omt@romeo.logica.co.uk>
 <87d86lgn4i.fsf@mihalis.ix.netcom.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x4.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Nov 21 02:16:06 1998 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1998-11-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <87d86lgn4i.fsf@mihalis.ix.netcom.com>,
  Chris Morgan <mihalis@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> "Nobody" <nobody@logica.com> writes:
>
> > I have to work on a project soon using ada 83.I am
planning to do a little
> > programming before I start to learn some of the
language.
> >  If I wanted to get a compiler what is the best and do
I have to pay for a
> > license (which I will if necessary) etc.
>
> You can get a reasonable idea with GNAT using the -ada83
flag. It
> doesn't magically become an ada83 compiler but it knows
all ther Ada95
> consructs to disallow and the subtle differences wont be
worth
> worrying about yet.


The option is -gnat83, as clearly noted in the GNAT
documentation.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own