From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!cica!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!spdcc!merk!alliant!linus!chance!munck From: munck@chance.uucp (Robert Munck) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada 9X objectives Message-ID: <73079@linus.UUCP> Date: 10 Oct 89 15:00:32 GMT References: <72799@linus.UUCP> <6699@hubcap.clemson.edu> Reply-To: munck@chance.UUCP (Robert Munck) Organization: MITRE-McLean Software Engineering Laboratory List-Id: In a previous article, I said: > ... the Ada effort is NOT primarily concerned > with the state of the art in programming languages, but rather that > of large-scale software engineering. > And in article <6699@hubcap.clemson.edu> wtwolfe@hubcap.clemson.edu replied: > > I think otherwise: the effort is not to link Ada with the state > of the art in programming languages, but to link Ada with the > state of the art in software engineering. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Does anyone else get the feeling that he's not LISTENING? It must be wonderful to have the leisure to reply at length to every posting, no matter what, but the replies should be based on what was originally written. -- Bob , linus!munck.UUCP -- MS Z676, MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA 22120 -- 703/883-6688