From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,bfb89d61cc46e4b3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dennison@telepath.com Subject: Re: What ada 83 compiler is *best*. Date: 1998/11/18 Message-ID: <72v8eo$k2k$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 413224491 References: <72ue3m$omt@romeo.logica.co.uk> <1998Nov18.103329.1@eisner> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x2.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Nov 18 19:50:56 1998 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1998-11-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , to.reply@read.my.sig (Rick Thorne) wrote: > In article <1998Nov18.103329.1@eisner>, Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam wrote: > > > I would vote DEC Ada on VAX as "best", > > This is a perfect option! Since Ada and VAX are both rotting corpses > awaiting a dignified burial, you can spend valuable career time learning > BOTH and become COMPLETELY unmarketable!!! That depends on your definition of marketable. Its common for consultants to parley knowledge of orphaned OS'es and tools into very lucrative careers. -- T.E.D. -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own