From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7f3ed9f7030da79b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewarr@my-dejanews.com Subject: Re: Open-Source and programming style Date: 1998/11/16 Message-ID: <72ptv2$upm$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 412474059 References: <364d0243.39960214@SantaClara01.news.InterNex.Net> <01be0ff2$6dd17b60$96a55c8b@aptiva> <72knmb$q79$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <01be1089$329f0980$50a55c8b@aptiva> <364f3bbe.214201@SantaClara01.news.InterNex.Net> <87ogq848xf.fsf@mihalis.ix.netcom.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x2.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Nov 16 19:21:07 1998 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1998-11-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <87ogq848xf.fsf@mihalis.ix.netcom.com>, Chris Morgan wrote: > Andi Kleen writes: > > > Regarding your assertion that big Open Source software always have a fixed > > spec because they're cloning something: good counter examples are GNU emacs > > and PGP (before it went commercial) > > This is true as far as it goes, however RMS made GNU Emacs based on > his experiences with previous Emacsen dating back to his original > version. It does seem then that GPL is a particularly good fit for > software which is well-understood by the people wishing to develop > it. Cloners in the case of some well-known GPL items, but in many > notable cases the original visionaries arrive at GPL after experience > with other schemes such as proprietary or other "freeware" > licenses. Perhaps GPL is the happy-hunting grounds where programs go > to be happy after having served their time being used to wring money > from users in previous incarnations. This last statement by Chris seems completely bogus to me. I can only think of counterexamples. Linux itself, which is the culmination of RMS' vision of a freely distributed OS, EMACS, GCC, GNAT, GDB etc. -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own