From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,25457a5aee9eaa04
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.201.132 with SMTP id ka4mr6724745pbc.8.1338666050992;
        Sat, 02 Jun 2012 12:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 l9ni12297pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: darkestkhan <darkestkhan@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Fuzzy machine learning framework v1.2
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 12:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <72fd9182-669e-4d9a-a89c-c65c5a58780e@googlegroups.com>
References: <4fc4fd1c$0$294$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <3MDSK83K41059.2087037037@reece.net.au>
 <db0aa54b-9e7c-4a1f-8e68-7b21bb7b37cb@googlegroups.com>
 <op.we83lizjule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <b6f95080-6198-409c-b87a-0487cf6205ae@googlegroups.com>
 <op.we9kildxule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <4fc9f04f$0$6559$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <op.we9xrwatule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <19265b67-d516-43b1-91e3-11bd8d97ebfa@googlegroups.com>
 <op.wfabrce4ule2fv@douda-yannick>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.59.74.180
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1338666050 18905 127.0.0.1 (2 Jun 2012 19:40:50
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 19:40:50 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <op.wfabrce4ule2fv@douda-yannick>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=193.59.74.180;
 posting-account=nuF4hQoAAADjc2KKS1rOkzxWWEmaDrvx
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2012-06-02T12:40:50-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Saturday, June 2, 2012 4:51:02 PM UTC, Hibou57 (Yannick Duch=EAne) wrote=
:
> That does not change anything to the suspicion raised by an assertion lik=
e:
> > There is enough evidence that fraud
> > in business is a reasonable assumption.
>=20
> (providing I did not erroneously understand, or else, example reasonable =
=20
> assumption would be welcome)
>=20

Example of fraud in software industry:
http://gpl-violations.org/news/20060922-dlink-judgement_frankfurt.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gpl-violations.org#Fortinet

And if someone would make much more detailed searching I bet he would find =
much more frauds (with example being K3D and VST plugin which also is fraud=
)