From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,31403a0a3ad84da4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewarr@my-dejanews.com Subject: Re: FORTRAN to ADA transl Date: 1998/11/12 Message-ID: <72div9$se1$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 410924036 References: <3647382E.42E6B4BD@cisi.fr> <364752C1.2B8745C1@maths.unine.ch> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x7.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Nov 12 02:59:53 1998 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1998-11-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <364752C1.2B8745C1@maths.unine.ch>, Gautier de Montmollin wrote: > To be sure: find (even by testing) the precision of the > fortran floats > and specify it with a "delta" in Ada. Delta???? for float types???? This response is confused! -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own