From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.224.66.70 with SMTP id m6mr15450425qai.6.1374151670424; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 05:47:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.35.68 with SMTP id f4mr536408qej.0.1374151670408; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 05:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Path: border1.nntp.ams3.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!news.glorb.com!t19no1931073qam.0!news-out.google.com!dk8ni470qab.0!nntp.google.com!t19no2082256qam.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 05:47:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2.230.82.82; posting-account=GfZx5woAAADTB-o-XOdlp4UQ5ID5xKzF NNTP-Posting-Host: 2.230.82.82 References: <46f7ac55-b920-4003-8cac-a9cbc24b29a2@googlegroups.com> <3b1b00b6-9799-4827-b51c-8e08d4dc6e91@googlegroups.com> <600aa74c-78af-4d43-9301-ab9c0022f825@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <72a51d66-2ebf-4162-8df7-bcde8c6626cf@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: ZFS/BtrFS bindings From: Dufr Injection-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:47:50 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Original-Bytes: 1989 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:182572 Date: 2013-07-18T05:47:50-07:00 List-Id: > I'm presuming that you want to get xattr of files that are open in Ada. That > means that you have to have some cooperation from your vendor, in that Ada > does not make implementation artifacts like file handles available. Some > implementations might have a way to get those, some might not. > > The problem is much easier if you just want to get xattr based on file > names, because then one could write a binding to do just that, and avoid any > interaction with the Ada implementation. Sorry but I couldn't understand the difference between the two cases. Would you mind elaborating a bit on that?