From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.182.45.138 with SMTP id n10mr2548416obm.4.1430964113426; Wed, 06 May 2015 19:01:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.152.102 with SMTP id ux6mr1036igb.0.1430964113367; Wed, 06 May 2015 19:01:53 -0700 (PDT) Path: border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!l13no14880866iga.0!news-out.google.com!n7ni26614igk.0!nntp.google.com!m20no9010090iga.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 19:01:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1pt8prok2jax6.distrri6z4l9.dlg@40tude.net> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=123.2.70.40; posting-account=S_MdrwoAAAD7T2pxG2e393dk6y0tc0Le NNTP-Posting-Host: 123.2.70.40 References: <1kxou0nloqg9c$.1x0itzgdrlosm$.dlg@40tude.net> <1i8x3r1feyzkt$.j85il7e3wpv9.dlg@40tude.net> <142zdljlf0w57.1xh4g0wxv88y8.dlg@40tude.net> <1clezdvkle213$.z5pl2xkhti8a$.dlg@40tude.net> <723a14f8-d648-4612-acca-833db6a337d5@googlegroups.com> <12de08w8nsrts.qn1blaxh6pe1.dlg@40tude.net> <0b2fd749-145d-46fd-9f4c-75812c1afd05@googlegroups.com> <1pt8prok2jax6.distrri6z4l9.dlg@40tude.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <72952a0a-3667-41f0-acc8-6565e022db2e@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: getting same output as gfortran, long_float From: robin.vowels@gmail.com Injection-Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 02:01:53 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:193051 Date: 2015-05-06T19:01:52-07:00 List-Id: On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 12:47:17 AM UTC+10, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On Mon, 4 May 2015 06:45:19 -0700 (PDT), r.nospam@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Monday, May 4, 2015 at 8:18:37 PM UTC+10, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > >> On Mon, 4 May 2015 01:53:08 -0700 (PDT), r.nospam@gmail.com wrote: > >> > >>> On Monday, May 4, 2015 at 5:21:28 PM UTC+10, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > >>>> On Sun, 3 May 2015 17:15:15 -0700 (PDT), r.nospam@gmail.com wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Friday, May 1, 2015 at 5:45:23 PM UTC+10, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>> Actually REAL*16 is exactly portable. > >>>>> > >>>>> No it's not. > >>>>> Some compilers treat that is an error. > >>>> > >>>> Portability applies to compilable programs only. You could not compile > >>>> > >>>> type X is mod 2**64; > >>>> > >>>> either. That does not make it non-portable, IMO. > >>>> > >>>> Portable means: The program exposes same [logically relevant] behavior on > >>>> all platforms [of interest]. > >>> > >>> Portable means that a program that adheres to the language standard > >>> is capable of running on any system where there is a compiler for that language. > >> > >> Consider a system without text output. According to you Ada's Hello World > >> program is non-portable because such systems exist. > > > > I said no such thing. > > No which thing? Ada RTL without Ada.Text_IO? Read the sentence before "I said no such thing.".