From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 1 Dec 92 21:44:12 GMT
From: mcsun!uknet!yorkohm!minster!mjl-b@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: Open Systems closed to Ada?
Message-ID: <723246251.26591@minster.york.ac.uk>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1992Dec1.021017.23228@fcom.cc.utah.edu> val@news.ccutah.edu (Val Ka
rtchner) writes:
>: In article <1992Nov30.215944.17819@fcom.cc.utah.edu> I wrote:
>: I have spent my professional career in the defense community.  Of the other
>: programmers that I personally know, only 25% prefer Ada over any other
>: language.  I know of no programmers in the commercial sector who would
>: prefer to program in Ada.
>
>Perhaps I should have phrased it as "Personally, I know of no programmers...."
>By "personally" I mean people that I have met face-to-face, and by "know" I
>mean that I know what they are doing now (as in current employment) as far
>as languages and their programming preferences.

The trouble with personal experiences is that they're all different. I know
of some C++ programmers who used Ada for a project and are now "Ada
converts". You know some C++ programmers who don't like Ada. I know some who
do. My example is just as valid as yours, and just as meaningless.

>|== "I think, therefore I AMiga" -- val@csulx.weber.edu ==\///= Ogden UT USA =
|

Mat

| Mathew Lodge                      | "I don't care how many times they go    |
| mjl-b@minster.york.ac.uk          |  up-tiddly-up-up. They're still gits."  |
| Langwith College, Uni of York, UK |  -- Blackadder Goes Forth               |