From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,bb64af239ed9c109
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!e23g2000vbe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "patrick.gunia@googlemail.com" <patrick.gunia@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Analyzing Memory Consumption of Ada-Programs
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 02:30:38 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <720d421b-815a-431a-b324-5a068182a40d@e23g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <506b53fd-d72f-49e1-b4ec-b2b654499e2d@t11g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
	<gtsn88$2u2$2@news.motzarella.org> <op.utivt01g5afhvo@chenrezig>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 78.34.66.221
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1241688638 1571 127.0.0.1 (7 May 2009 09:30:38
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 09:30:38 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: e23g2000vbe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=78.34.66.221;
	posting-account=D7TrwwoAAAAVyN71CASRiSp392RIjlsB
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.64 (Windows NT 6.0; U;
 de) Presto/2.1.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5721
Date: 2009-05-07T02:30:38-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 6 Mai, 21:16, "Ed Falis" <fa...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 06 May 2009 15:08:56 -0400, Nicholas Paul Collin Gloucester =A0
>
> <Colin_Paul_Glos...@acm.org> wrote:
> > On 2009-05-06, patrick.gu...@googlemail.com
> > <patrick.gu...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > |--------------|
> > |"[..] =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 |
> > |refracturing."|
> > |--------------|
>
> > Sirrah,
>
> > I thank you for the amusing insight into refactoring :)
>
> You're not the only one who enjoyed that one.

hm...don=B4t know why I wrote that, but in the end you all understood
what I meant!
hopefully my refactored code doesn=B4t contain too many fractures!