From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fdb77,764cbe34e0365b81
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4438af6225b2af65,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,4438af6225b2af65,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
From: "Pat Rogers" <progers@NOclasswideSPAM.com>
Subject: Re: Real time Java? Huh?
Date: 1998/11/05
Message-ID: <71tpsr$hva$1@supernews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 408896118
References: <363E1DE8.4189EBAC@solaris.ok> <nagleF1uyME.3IA@netcom.com>
 <364024f5.3575731@news.demon.co.uk> <364071C4.619D@world.std.com>
 <3641ca4b.23637018@news.demon.co.uk> <3641B718.DBF4C37C@tisny.com>
 <36431ca0.301400410@news.netcomuk.co.uk> <364224FB.7FCF@world.std.com>
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
X-Trace: 910322395 Y6JRGRJUHDE83C640C usenet77.supernews.com
Organization: Software Arts & Sciences
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++
Date: 1998-11-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

David Chase wrote in message <364224FB.7FCF@world.std.com>...

<snip>

>Most of that commercial software is written in "unsafe" languages.
>C++ is not safe.  Pascal is not safe.  Ada, as typically used,
>is not safe.

Detailed, hard evidence, please, regarding Ada.