From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID,
	PLING_QUERY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3c37d6ac44550e08
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewarr@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: ??? Help!: how to do unconstraned arrays/records???
Date: 1998/11/05
Message-ID: <71sc81$6hs$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 408656689
References: <36407C96.731EEB90@avionics2.robins.af.mil>
 <36410B43.E0D799BC@hom.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x3.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Nov 05 14:20:49 1998 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/2.02 (OS/2; I)
Date: 1998-11-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <36410B43.E0D799BC@hom.net>,
  "Albert S. Johnston" <johnston@hom.net> wrote:
> woops, I forgot... I am using ada 83
>
> Somebody help PLEASE!


Why are you using an obsolete language at this stage. I can understand the
cases of large scale legacy projects that committed some time ago to the
technology, but it is hard to believe that this is your case.

Given a situation in which inexpensive and freely available Ada 95 compilers
are available, it seems a waste of time to use Ada 83 at this stage.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own