From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,3e9e2e402ed75bc3
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
X-Received: by 10.224.58.77 with SMTP id f13mr22070313qah.7.1366702962591;
        Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.49.127.200 with SMTP id ni8mr2735141qeb.42.1366702962574;
 Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 ef9ni9516qab.0!nntp.google.com!gp5no5098950qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <e1ca1318-247f-4868-906a-941123c81cc2@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=195.182.34.201;
 posting-account=bMuEOQoAAACUUr_ghL3RBIi5neBZ5w_S
NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.182.34.201
References: <cb0c69fa-3393-4bbf-88af-0399057226f7@googlegroups.com>
 <87vc7fm3lp.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk>
 <e1ca1318-247f-4868-906a-941123c81cc2@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <71f9b51c-564a-4a20-bc42-01e2eda23d03@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: aws vs ruby rails or php? how much faster?
From: Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 07:42:42 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2013-04-23T00:42:42-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

W dniu poniedzia=C5=82ek, 22 kwietnia 2013 22:04:23 UTC+2 u=C5=BCytkownik j=
ohannes falcone napisa=C5=82:

> is there any problem running a fleet of AWS behind a load balancer?

And why there should be any problems?
We are using AWS servers behind nginx, which can also act as a load balance=
r. It works like a charm from the very first day when it was set up.

> if in rare case 1 aws on 1 box not enuf?

If your service is doing anything useful apart from serving static content,=
 then you will have some more components down the stream to take care of. I=
n other words, don't worry about AWS, all the bottlenecks will be elsewhere=
.

--=20
Maciej Sobczak * http://www.msobczak.com * http://www.inspirel.com