From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,3ffb65141990540c X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!m21g2000vbr.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: sjw Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Hard and soft real time with Ada Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 03:29:02 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <71f32d79-f0fa-4fc9-bd9f-a1583e8684af@m21g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> References: <4o3r0ouc23gx$.1dxknpkniq39u$.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 20.133.0.13 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1274092142 15833 127.0.0.1 (17 May 2010 10:29:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 10:29:02 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: m21g2000vbr.googlegroups.com; posting-host=20.133.0.13; posting-account=_RXWmAoAAADQS3ojtLFDmTNJCT0N2R4U User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11686 Date: 2010-05-17T03:29:02-07:00 List-Id: On May 17, 9:30=A0am, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote: > Hmm, I doubt USB can be considered real-time. But I see no obvious reason > why a computer vision application could not tolerate some jitter (say > 100=B5s). I guess you just do not need "very hard" real-time. Clearly you wouldn't want to plug just any random USB device into a system which expected known, bounded response times. Not that anyone is going to be plugging any random USB device into a drone, especially in flight ... But is there anything about USB which makes the latencies etc for a particular set of devices unbounded? If not, why shouldn't USB be used in an appropriate application?