From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!fs1!coho.ee.ubc.ca!mikeb
From: mikeb@coho.ee.ubc.ca (Mike Bolotski)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How common are Ada compilers?
Message-ID: <717@fs1.ee.ubc.ca>
Date: 23 Nov 89 04:26:04 GMT
References: <2350@draken.nada.kth.se> <7137@hubcap.clemson.edu>
Sender: news@fs1.ee.ubc.ca
Reply-To: mikeb@ee.ubc.ca (Mike Bolotski)
Organization: Dept. of Electrical Engineering University of B.C.
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <7137@hubcap.clemson.edu> billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu writes:
>> Which SUN computers have Ada compilers? 
>
>   Sun-386i, Sun 3/50, 52, 60, 75, 110, 160, 180, 260, & 280,
>   and Sun-4/110, 150, 260, & 280, as of July 1989.
>

Just to bloat the list a little bit, how about citing the various 
monochrome/color frame buffer combinations and memory configurations?
That ought to at least *triple* the number of computers without adding
any useful information, just like citing 260/280 as distinct computers.

Marketing strikes again.


Mike Bolotski, Department of Electrical Engineering,
               University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada 
mikeb@ee.ubc.ca                    | mikeb%ee.ubc.ca@relay.ubc.ca
ee.ubc.ca!mikeb@uunet.uu.net       | uunet!ubc-cs!ee.ubc.ca!mikeb