From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,103803355c3db607 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.228.227 with SMTP id sl3mr6502542pbc.5.1341405494838; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 05:38:14 -0700 (PDT) Path: l9ni10838pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d6g2000vbe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Mark Lorenzen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT (GCC) Profile Guided Compilation Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 05:36:35 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <7140953c-fd55-4875-be72-31e14ac17422@d6g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> References: <38b9c365-a2b2-4b8b-8d2a-1ea39d08ce86@googlegroups.com> <982d531a-3972-4971-b802-c7e7778b8649@googlegroups.com> <520bdc39-6004-4142-a227-facf14ebb0e8@googlegroups.com> <4ff08cb2$0$6575$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <4ff1d731$0$6582$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <4ff41d38$0$6577$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <26b778c4-5abc-4fbf-94b0-888c2ce71831@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.163.1.105 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1341405494 8667 127.0.0.1 (4 Jul 2012 12:38:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 12:38:14 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d6g2000vbe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=193.163.1.105; posting-account=Srm5lQoAAAAEMX9rv2ilEKR6FDPapmSq User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/13.0.1,gzip(gfe) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2012-07-04T05:36:35-07:00 List-Id: On 4 Jul., 12:57, Keean Schupke wrote: > > How can I turn off inlining for a function in GNAT? > > GNAT seems to be automatically inlining some functions despite not having -gnatn enabled nor having a pragma Inline for the function. > Option "-fno-inline"? Regards, Mark L