From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,92471489ebbc99c6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewarr@my-dejanews.com Subject: Re: Y2K Issues Date: 1998/10/27 Message-ID: <713oes$dbn$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 405480970 References: <362B53A3.64E266AB@res.raytheon.com> <362B8D2F.802F42E6@lmco.com> <710nnc$jop@felix.seas.gwu.edu> <7125a8$e7u$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x11.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 202.135.47.101 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Oct 27 06:15:56 1998 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/3.0 (Win95; I) Date: 1998-10-27T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7125a8$e7u$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, dennison@telepath.com wrote: > In article <710nnc$jop@felix.seas.gwu.edu>, > Don't be quite so hard on uSoft. ObjectAda 7.1.1 had this exact same problem. > I understand it has been fixed in the current release, though. The remarkable thing about this (quite common) leap year bug is that it is a great example of how a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing. Someone who knows nothing about century corrections will get things right, someone who knows how centuray corrections work will get things right, it is only someone who knows about century corrections, but does not know how they work who gets things wrong. I have always assumed that one of the reasons for the range of years in Ada is precisely that you don't have to worry about century corrections :-) Robert Dewar -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own