From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,92471489ebbc99c6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dennison@telepath.com Subject: Re: Y2K Issues Date: 1998/10/26 Message-ID: <7125a8$e7u$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 405196394 References: <362B53A3.64E266AB@res.raytheon.com> <362B8D2F.802F42E6@lmco.com> <710nnc$jop@felix.seas.gwu.edu> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x8.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Oct 26 15:43:04 1998 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.05 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1998-10-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <710nnc$jop@felix.seas.gwu.edu>, mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman) wrote: > As it so happens, I just saw this juicy bit of news: > > According to "PC Week", issue of 10/19/98, Microsoft's > SQL Server 6.5's task manager refuses to recognize Feb. > 29, 2000 as a valid date. Apparently Microsoft's programmers > never learned the real rules for leap years - a year divisible > by 400 _is_ one. Microsoft has acknowledged the bug and will > fix it in a "service pack" (Microsoft jargon for a patch). ... > Amazing. Where did these people go to school? Don't be quite so hard on uSoft. ObjectAda 7.1.1 had this exact same problem. I understand it has been fixed in the current release, though. -- T.E.D. -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own