From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,92471489ebbc99c6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@gnat.com
Subject: Re: Y2K Issues
Date: 1998/10/19
Message-ID: <70g6gg$2a0$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 402912318
References: <362B53A3.64E266AB@res.raytheon.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x8.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 209.73.133.253
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Oct 19 20:13:04 1998 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/2.02 (OS/2; I)
Date: 1998-10-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <362B53A3.64E266AB@res.raytheon.com>,
  John J Cupak Jr <John_J_Cupak@res.raytheon.com> wrote:

> If this is a compiler vendor issue, what compilers have "certified"
> their date calculations Y2K correct?

GNAT Professional is certified to be Y2K compliant, and I would assume that
any other vendor of a commercial Ada product would at this stage be in a
position to certify Y2K compliance (most customers require that these days!)

Robert Dewar
Ada Core Technologies

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own