From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,672b169dc220673a
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.195.131 with SMTP id ie3mr17363816pbc.8.1337418237375;
        Sat, 19 May 2012 02:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 pr3ni4397pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Marius Amado-Alves <amado.alves@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Vector (container) initialization: the schizophrenic ampersand
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 02:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <70817af5-96c3-4ca7-8d1c-b7635452bf4c@googlegroups.com>
References: <10616734.43.1337286031745.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbjy7>
 <70510fa1-e554-44a7-9364-e745674c1bda@googlegroups.com>
 <28845c63-b06c-4ac2-b5d5-e408c0ff4b7f@googlegroups.com>
 <wcc7gw9ipio.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 188.80.80.196
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1337418237 6400 127.0.0.1 (19 May 2012 09:03:57
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 09:03:57 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <wcc7gw9ipio.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=188.80.80.196;
 posting-account=3cDqWgoAAAAZXc8D3pDqwa77IryJ2nnY
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-05-19T02:03:56-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> > V : My_Vectors.Vector := Element1 + Element2 + Element3;
> >
> > A bit less inelegant.
> >
> > /* But more than parenthesis or T'(...) in my view. */
> 
> You mean more inelegant, or more elegant?

Oops, sorry, I mean more elegant, i.e. I find

   Element1 + Element2 + Element3

more elegant than

   (T'(Element1) & T'(Element2)) & T'(Element3)

or variations thereof. (Textual elegancy. I agree the latter form has more semantic rigour = abstract elegancy.)