From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watdaisy.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!watdaisy!ndiamond
From: ndiamond@watdaisy.UUCP (Norman Diamond)
Newsgroups: net.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ada certification question
Message-ID: <7080@watdaisy.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 18-Mar-85 13:20:06 EST
Article-I.D.: watdaisy.7080
Posted: Mon Mar 18 13:20:06 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 19-Mar-85 03:41:59 EST
References: <333@wdl1.UUCP>
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>       The AJPO does not seem to be a bottleneck here.  In practice, compiler
> vendors seem to pass certification for the first time long before they have
> a usable product, since you can certify before you make your compiler either
> fast or user-friendly.
> 					John Nagle

Shouldn't this be posted to net.lang.fortran or net.lang.lisp?
After all, net.lang.ada is for fortran-vs-lisp debates.
-- 

   Norman Diamond

UUCP:  {decvax|utzoo|ihnp4|allegra}!watmath!watdaisy!ndiamond
CSNET: ndiamond%watdaisy@waterloo.csnet
ARPA:  ndiamond%watdaisy%waterloo.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa

"Opinions are those of the keyboard, and do not reflect on me or higher-ups."