From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f9437,544c98121879c710 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9437,public X-Google-Thread: f9437,ca641b3dcee9ee4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9437,public X-Google-Thread: fac41,544c98121879c710 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: fac41,ca641b3dcee9ee4 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b99334cb89bcb335 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,ca641b3dcee9ee4 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,544c98121879c710 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,ca641b3dcee9ee4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,544c98121879c710 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,ca641b3dcee9ee4 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,544c98121879c710 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,ca641b3dcee9ee4 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public From: kszabo@nortel.ca (Kevin Szabo) Subject: Re: RFD: comp.object.moderated moderated Date: 1998/10/14 Message-ID: <701rtn$3k7$1@bcarh8ab.ca.nortel.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 400928489 References: <907918039.22235@isc.org> <36210B47.6A5FE581@eiffel.com> <363314e1.131092310@enews.newsguy.com> Organization: Nortel (Northern Telecom) Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Reply-To: kszabo@nortel.ca Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.object,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <363314e1.131092310@enews.newsguy.com>, Bob Hutchison wrote: >Pardon me for saying this, but every response to Meyer's article that >has reached my news service is off topic. > >Is anyone actually going to respond to what he said? The article never reached my server, but lots of follow ups did. Could it have been a forgery that was cancelled by the perpetrator? The snippets of the original posting that I have seen did not seem like the writings of a well-respected industry leader ... they were more like the rantings of an adolescent. I found the charter for comp.object.moderated was very well written and I applaud the attempt to bring a noise-free forum for object-oriented discussions back to life.