From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,799e6e37c90ca633
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Pat Rogers" <progers@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Future Ada language revisions?
Date: 1998/10/08
Message-ID: <6vjd6n$152$1@uuneo.neosoft.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 399145781
References: <6um7on$db5$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <6vj4sb$m3o$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Organization: NeoSoft, Inc.  
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-10-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

dennison@telepath.com wrote in message
<6vj4sb$m3o$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
>Ok, here's a couple of omissions I'm curious about. How come task
and
>controlled types can't be tagged? It would sure be nice to be able
to extend
>them.


A nasty little problem.  Have a look at Burns' and Wellings' book
"Concurrency In Ada".

-- pat

Patrick Rogers
progers@acm.org