From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4b12bc9a1cc5c6c3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dennison@telepath.com Subject: Re: Spawning a subprocess and communicating with it. Date: 1998/10/08 Message-ID: <6vigu4$n17$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 398993236 References: <6vf97a$uj5@gcsin3.geccs.gecm.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x5.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Oct 08 14:06:59 1998 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.05 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1998-10-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <6vf97a$uj5@gcsin3.geccs.gecm.com>, John McCabe wrote: > As a matter of interest, should it not be possible to do interprocess > communication using the RPC stuff defined in the Distributed Systems > Annexe? > > Does anyone fully support that yet? There is a gnat add-on called GLADE that supports it on *some* gnat platforms. To my knowledge no one else supports it. To my mind that whole annex misses the mark. It doesn't actually require different implementations to interoperate. Thus even if every compiler suppored it, it would be useless unless you are developing a system using a single compiler and architecture. -- T.E.D. -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own