From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-30 10:17:58 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!cambridge1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!bos-service1.ext.raytheon.com!cyclone.swbell.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!border3.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 12:17:58 -0500 Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 12:18:16 -0500 From: Wesley Groleau Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com Organization: Ain't no organization here! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-mx, pt-br, fr-ca MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X References: <6a90b886.0305262344.1d558079@posting.google.com> <3ED41344.7090105@spam.com> <3ED46D81.FF62C34F@0.0> <3ED46E07.4340CABC@0.0> <3ED4F3FD.A0EF7079@alfred-hilscher.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <6vWcnTWjF83bD0qjXTWcpA@gbronline.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.117.18.106 X-Trace: sv3-b6iB+chrwc2jiV514RiVnPn9+9oCVOGL+zdjsOlqzqujdLcSg5Ahgchw1pX98KjeJjikie5lWXqQ1xk!I4pPUzkaOs7ezo5llQ9i4/t2ab3b09CabcjCQu/qolKGOKbAMbrLVBTU/SxhAsytZA2BrXja71lZ!vGRDYg== X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38122 Date: 2003-05-30T12:18:16-05:00 List-Id: > And let's not forget that +=, -=, etc. also allow for more efficient > in-place vector/matrix operations because they avoid the need for a > temporary. If you don't understand this, that's OK, but please don't > argue with me because you will be wrong. Neither A := A + B; nor A += B; -- if it existed in Ada would need a temporary except when required by checking rules and exception rules. If one needs a temporary, the other does. After all, they are the same, are they not? The use of a temporary has NOTHING to do with which format you choose to write the SAME operation in.