From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ed6a891101ff4e06
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dennison@telepath.com
Subject: Re: Freeing Pointers to classwide types
Date: 1998/10/02
Message-ID: <6v2s7t$eq0$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 397052856
References: <3613a5b1.186262@SantaClara01.news.InterNex.Net>
 <F05vr9.HLv.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x2.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Oct 02 15:41:49 1998 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.05 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 1998-10-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <F05vr9.HLv.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>,
  stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft) wrote:

> Yes.  Specify the 'Storage_Size associated with the access-type.
> The implementation is required to reclaim the storage for the
> access type when exiting its scope if a 'Storage_Size is specified
> (see RM95 13.11(18)).

Cool! I suppose that could lead to STORAGE_ERRORs when the code is modified,
though. That seems a reasonable trade-off.


--
T.E.D.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own