From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d7c037f1693a8e8a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewarr@my-dejanews.com Subject: Re: [Q]Ada benchmarking Date: 1998/10/01 Message-ID: <6v07pb$q4m$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 396703625 References: X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x13.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Oct 01 15:40:27 1998 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/2.02 (OS/2; I) Date: 1998-10-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Mark Taube wrote: > > In the Oct 98 issue of Dr Dobbs, there is an article on Bench++ for > benchmarking C++. The author mentions that it is derived from the Ada PIWG > benchmark. > > Is the Ada PIWG benchmark readily available on the internet? > > Has anybody used this to compare compilers and/or platforms? The answers to your questions are yes, and yes. The other source of benchmarks is ACES, particularly the quicklook section which is relatively easy to run. As benchmarks, these programs are somewhat useful, but like all benchmarks, they can give highly misleading results, and you should not base much on the results! -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own