From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,799e6e37c90ca633,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bpr5549@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Future Ada language revisions?
Date: 1998/09/27
Message-ID: <6um7on$db5$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 395390024
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x9.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 206.86.222.107
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun Sep 27 20:38:47 1998 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/3.01 (WinNT; I)
Date: 1998-09-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In a fairly recent c.l.a. discussion it was mentioned that there is no
plan for an Ada 0X project comparable to the 9X project. What is the process
by which incremental changes will be made to the language, and how does one
go about participating? Has anything changed with the demise of the AJPO?

-- Brian

PS: In case anyone is wondering, my main peeve is the restriction on out mode
function parameters, which I just don't understand, even when I'm trying to
open minded. I have yet to hear a good defense of this restriction, so if
anyone has one, I'm all ears, errr, eyes.

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp   Create Your Own Free Member Forum