From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5697899e4423465c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewarr@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: Boolean Representation
Date: 1998/09/25
Message-ID: <6uf02c$ogb$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 394608177
References: <6udkcj$87j$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <6udriu$hfi$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6ue3uh$qjo$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <360ab55c.12573963@SantaClara01.news.InterNex.Net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x13.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Sep 25 02:44:28 1998 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/2.02 (OS/2; I)
Date: 1998-09-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <360ab55c.12573963@SantaClara01.news.InterNex.Net>,
  tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran) wrote:
> >UNSIGNED_8 to a record type which provides
> >access to the individual bits.
>   Would "mod 256" do the job?

This is an odd question: UNSIGNED_8 *is* of course mod 256.
I think you missed the point of the question, which is to
convert something of type mod 256 to individual bits.

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp   Create Your Own Free Member Forum