From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,9f0bf354542633fd X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,d901a50a5adfec3c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dewarr@my-dejanews.com Subject: Re: Fortran or Ada? Date: 1998/09/24 Message-ID: <6udre0$ha1$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 394400665 References: <36068E73.F0398C54@meca.polymtl.ca> <6u8r5o$aa4$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <360A3446.8AD84137@lmco.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x13.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Sep 24 16:19:12 1998 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/2.02 (OS/2; I) Date: 1998-09-24T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Jeff Templon wrote: > > 2) you have to be more careful since with a big language, it is > easier to make a mistake in writing the program which turns out > to be valid syntax for some feature you didn't know about. Well it is certainly a design point of Ada to avoid situations in which small lexical errors cause major differences in the meaning of a program, and I think it achieves this goal pretty well. Certainly better than C for (i = 1; i < 10; i ++); a[i] = i; or Fortran: Do 10 i = 1.6 the latter being the (in)famous bug at the heart of the urban legend that the Venus probe died because of this bug :-) -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum