From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1044a3857acae1e1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-09 09:59:19 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!nf3.bellglobal.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!bin3.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com.POSTED!news.clear.net.nz From: Craig Carey Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT and NT DLL; An Ada-Comment resignation Message-ID: <6u0p3u0qhm54mp88f4lmaqu2p59r8qtpa0@4ax.com> References: X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Customer of Mercury Telecommunications Ltd Cache-Post-Path: localhost!unknown@tnt1-152.quicksilver.net.nz X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b3 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: drone5-svc-skyt.qsi.net.nz X-Original-Trace: 10 Jan 2002 06:58:59 +1300, drone5-svc-skyt.qsi.net.nz NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 11:59:02 CST X-Trace: sv3-cMj/BPiDU7rNhqdTjm8HJa5OkAjFZilOWciLGNHn+gtGmh8DCAxHcDbIqNwKWQhInsB5MfaEx/YV+BW!IQiq7edcnj8Ihj/NDXZX4xf7mNA5LbG/wjqRNpBiY4pFU7czwa6rKm3qd5HW6ZwbZqHDwhPzBEN1!jCrTfQ== X-Complaints-To: abuse@GigaNews.Com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 17:59:02 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18696 Date: 2002-01-09T17:59:02+00:00 List-Id: On 09 Jan 2002 11:20:05 +0100, Pascal Obry wrote: > >** writes: > >> MinGW executables are smaller than gcc executables. If gcc code > >There is a problem in this sentence. GCC uses MingW, so I don't understand >what you mean ? > >There is 2 flavors of GCC on[e] based on Cygwin and one on MingW. > >Pascal. I correct my statement, to say that Cygwin executables (not Gcc executables) are larger. But that is just of the small number I compared (not enough). A Gcc file named configure.in (from cvs files), mentions both of those two, so maybe the Cygwin code (with a -mno-cygwin) is not "flaky" (which a Mingw Faq suggested). -- Craig Carey http://www.ijs.co.nz/ada_95.htm