From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,efcb8823d186b06d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: warwicks@telusplanet.net (Chris Warwick)
Subject: Re: Ada 95 for SCO?
Date: 1998/09/11
Message-ID: <6tcnk7$5ce@priv-sys04-le0.telusplanet.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 390319340
References: <35F07349.EE7@mitre.org> <1fVLj9G29GA.166@samson.airnet.net>
 <6sutco$jiu$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Organization: gerf inc.
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-09-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <6sutco$jiu$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, dewarr@my-dejanews.com wrote:

>It certainly would not be very difficult to target GNAT to
>SCO, and indeed we did create a SCO port to a very early
>version of GNAT. However, we have had no significant customer
>interest in such a port so far.

I am aware of one of our subcontractor's using the free version of GNAT on SCO 
in order to unload some of the development work off the VADS compiler... So,  
I find Mr. Dewar's comment rather odd... We did at one point ask for the cost 
of supporting the GNAT on SCO and the price was somewhat more than we are 
paying for VADS...